American pesticide production, is incorporated as evidence.

American Chemical
Society. “Legacy of Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring National Historic Chemical
Landmark.” American Chemical Society, American Chemical Society, 26 Oct.
2012, www.acs.org/content/acs/en/education/whatischemistry/landmarks/rachel-carson-silent-spring.html.

The author of this source discusses Rachel Carson and the ways in
which her book, Silent Spring, transformed public perspective and
the field of science. Context concerning the period in which the book was
published is included to describe Carson’s purpose in writing her book. During
the years between the end of World War II and
the late 1950s, scientific war technologies such as chemical pesticides were
integrated into the lives of civilians. Many people were unaware of the risks
that these pollutants brought. As a result, Carson sought to inform the public
of the hazards associated with these commercially used chemicals. The
author goes on to explain the shift in public perspective that occurred as a
result of the book’s principal themes concerning pesticide usage. The article also
includes the extent to which the book influenced government policy as well as
modern chemistry. The main ideas expressed are supported by historical events such
as the dates of public testimonies and the years in which environmental
restrictions were enacted. Additionally, statistical data, including the trend
of pesticide production, is incorporated as evidence. A limitation of this text
is the existing bias in favor of Carson’s ideas. The author dismisses opposing viewpoints
pertaining to the book’s claims. Nonetheless, this article serves as an appropriate
source for this topic of research because it highlights the importance and
extent of Silent Spring’s influence.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

 

Carson,
Rachel. “The Obligation to Endure.” Silent Spring, Fawcett
Publications, 1964, pp. 12-16. PDF.

This chapter in the book, Silent Spring, by
Rachel Carson, discusses the dangers of pesticides and chemical spraying
practices. The author points out the violent nature of chemical pesticides towards
all living organisms, regardless of the designated target. Carson further explains
the lack of awareness concerning this topic and the ignorance displayed by
multiple industries. Many corporations only seek to earn profit and do not
acknowledge the dangers of chemical pollutants. Among these destructive factors
are radioactive toxins from nuclear power plants and industrial biocides. The
ignorance and the continuation of unregulated pesticide usage will lead to
harmful consequences not only to the environment, but the health of humanity.
The author urges the public to reevaluate these damaging procedures and address
the situation before it worsens. Carson validates her assertions by including
statistical data relating to American pesticide production and analyzing the
ruinous effects of individual substances. In the text, there is a firm attack
on the practices of the chemical industries which serves as a limitation since
the viewpoint of the other party is not voiced. However, this source remains
substantial in research because it clearly outlines an environmental call to
action stimulated by inappropriate chemical usage.

 

Poffet, Gérard. “50
Years of Silent Spring.” GAIA: Ecological Perspectives for Science
& Society, vol. 21, no. 3, Sept. 2012, p. 161. EBSCOhost, proxygsu-sfor.galileo.usg.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eih&AN=84314143&site=eds-live&scope=site.

 

This scholarly article regards Silent Spring as one of the
most influential publications in the fields of toxicology and environmental
science. It discusses the ways in which the book altered the general
perspective of how chemicals affect the environment. The author claims that Silent
Spring was a pivotal factor in establishing further regulation of chemical
pollutants and in initiating various environmental laws. Over the past 50
years, numerous regulatory practices have been implemented to control the use
of insecticides, industrial chemicals, and other environmental pollutants.
Plans to reduce hazards to both the environment and human health have been
examined and integrated into government policy. Laws to regulate the
importation and exportation of chemicals have also been implemented. Poffet
supports central claims by referencing specific conventions and conferences in
which regulations were developed and examined. He also mentions the years that
correspond to initiation of certain government codes. The foremost limitation
of this article is that many of the government meetings mentioned are slightly
outdated. However, this text remains a credible source since it accurately
expresses the political effects of Silent
Spring. It relates well to the thesis in that it emphasizes book’s importance
in changing public perspective and government legislation.

 

Stoll, Mark. “RACHEL
CARSON’S SILENT SPRING, A BOOK THAT CHANGED THE WORLD.” Environment &
Society Portal, Environment & Society Portal, 2012, www.environmentandsociety.org/exhibitions/silent-spring/us-federal-government-responds

As seen in this article,
Mark Stoll highlights the impact of Silent Spring, by Rachel Carson, in relation to several aspects of the
public’s response. Specifically, Stoll claims that the book elicited widespread
influence as evidenced by alterations in government policy, changes in general
perception of the environment, and impressions left on modern culture. The
author relays the central message of the book which discussed chemical
pollutants and how these substances negatively affected humanity. According to Stoll,
the problems outlined in Silent Spring
prompted the United States Department of Agriculture, as well as the Public
Health Service to reexamine certain chemical practices. Additionally, as the
book’s influence spread, numerous aspects of popular culture including comics,
magazines, music, and television shows began to integrate Carson’s core claims.
The author of this article supports the main ideas by using historical
occurrences such as Congressional hearings and the passage of certain
regulations. References to related works, and documented quotations are also
utilized. The main limitation of the article is that it harbors some bias
toward the novel’s beneficial impacts since it rejects related criticisms. Nevertheless,
the article maintains relevance to the thesis in that it explores various
contributing factors of the book’s impact.